Blog

1200 x 628 vs 1200 x 627: Which Size Is Right?

October 5, 2026

Resize Image to 1200 × 627 (LinkedIn Post)Runs in your browser — free, no upload, no watermark.

If you've ever tried to make a link preview image, you've probably hit this: one guide says 1200 x 628, another says 1200 x 627, Facebook's own docs say 1200 x 630, and your design template is set to something else entirely. All four look identical. So which one is actually correct?

Short answer: all of them are fine. They're all approximations of the same aspect ratio, and the difference between them is three pixels on a 630-pixel-tall image — roughly half of one percent. But it's worth understanding where the numbers come from, because knowing that saves you from re-exporting the same banner five times.

They're all trying to hit 1.91:1

The Open Graph protocol — the set of meta tags Facebook, LinkedIn, Slack, iMessage and most other platforms read to build a link preview — recommends an image with a 1.91:1 aspect ratio. That's it. 1.91 is already a rounded number, so when different companies multiply it out, they land in slightly different places:

  • 1200 ÷ 1.91 = 628.27 → rounds to 1200 x 628
  • 1200 x 630 = exactly 1.905:1 → Facebook's documented recommendation
  • 1200 x 627 = 1.914:1 → LinkedIn's long-standing published size
  • 1200 x 625 = exactly 1.92:1 → shows up in older templates

None of these is "wrong." They're rounding artifacts of the same spec. Crawlers don't reject an image for being three pixels off; they just need the file to be at least 200 x 200 and ideally 1200px wide so it renders sharp on high-density screens.

Does the 3-pixel difference ever matter?

In practice, only in one situation: tight crops. Platforms don't display your image at its native size — they fit it into whatever card layout they use that month, and the edges get trimmed. If your headline text runs right up to the top of the frame, a 1200 x 628 image cropped to a 1.78:1 card will clip it, and so would 1200 x 630.

The fix isn't picking the "correct" pixel count. It's leaving a safe margin: keep logos and text inside the middle ~90% of the canvas and nothing important within 60px of any edge. Then it genuinely doesn't matter which of the three sizes you export.

How to make one image that works everywhere

My recommendation: build at 1200 x 630. It's Facebook's documented size, it's within a hair of 1.91:1, and it's an even number, which avoids odd half-pixel rendering in some editors. Then reuse that same file for LinkedIn, Slack, Discord and Open Graph tags generally.

If you already have an image at the wrong dimensions, here's the quick way to fix it without installing anything:

  1. Open the crop tool and crop your source photo to roughly a 1.91:1 shape first. This is the step people skip — if you jump straight to resizing, a 4:3 photo gets squashed and faces look subtly wrong.
  2. Take the cropped file into the resize tool and set it to 1200 x 630 (or 628, or 627 — pick one and move on).
  3. Export as JPG for photos, PNG only if you need crisp text or transparency behind a logo. The image converter handles that switch if your source is a PNG, WebP or HEIC.

Everything happens inside your browser on cutbg — the file never leaves your computer, there's no upload queue and no account. That matters more than people realize for unreleased product shots or client work you haven't announced yet.

Watch the file size too

Platforms have upload and fetch limits — Facebook caps Open Graph images at 8MB, and some crawlers quietly give up on anything slow to download. A 1200 x 630 JPG should comfortably land between 100KB and 300KB. If your export is a multi-megabyte PNG, run it through the compressor first. Smaller files also mean the preview actually appears instead of showing a blank card while the crawler times out.

If the preview still shows the old image

This is almost never a sizing problem. Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter cache scraped previews aggressively. After replacing the file, run the URL through the platform's own debugger (Facebook's Sharing Debugger, LinkedIn's Post Inspector) to force a re-scrape. Changing your image from 1200 x 627 to 1200 x 628 will not fix a cached preview — only clearing the cache will.

So: stop agonizing over the last pixel. Pick 1200 x 630, keep your text away from the edges, keep the file under a few hundred KB, and you're covered on every platform that reads Open Graph tags.

Resize Image to 1200 × 627 (LinkedIn Post)Runs in your browser — free, no upload, no watermark.